It installs fine yet I can not find it in when I need it. What a waste of my time More. Turn your photos into stunning works of art with this plugin for Photoshop. Color correction plug-in for Adobe Photoshop or Photoshop Elements. Laws concerning the use of this software vary from country to country. We do not encourage or condone the use of this program if it is in violation of these laws. In Softonic we scan all the files hosted on our platform to assess and avoid any potential harm for your device.
Our team performs checks each time a new file is uploaded and periodically reviews files to confirm or update their status. It also raised the bar for other editing tools like Lightroom and Photoshop but fear not.
We refer to the collection as Google as the creator, while DxO is incorporating it into their future products. You can find the Nik Collection here. While there are many tool packets, you only need one download to get all the components. The installer will walk you through each step, including which image editing tool you want to use the plug-in with. It scans your computer to find what compatible programs you have.
As with any new version download, it will take a bit of time to integrate this collection into your workflow. On my first use, I noticed a few things. When you select a tool to use on a photo, a pop-up window will appear to ask you what type of file you want the copy to be. The edits you do in Nik, even as a Lightroom plug-in, are on a copy of the photo. This is NOT a virtual copy; this is an actual new image file.
I gravitate towards TIFF to maintain as much quality to the image as possible. If the original file is anything else, like a JPEG, you can edit a copy of the original with NO Lightroom edits applied, or edit the original itself.
You have to select which Nik toolset to work with from the Lightroom menu. Some experimentation will help when you first download the Nik Collection. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.
EMBED for wordpress. Want more? And like all NIK products, these are good-looking, realistic presets. No Luminar, here. It is not unnecessarily complex. If you want to use baby mode, then just shift through the presets, pick the one you like and apply it. The other sliders etc are there for those who want them.
As for "film grain", I bought Exposure X6 just for the grain tool. It is much more natural and variable. There are about 8 sliders to control how it is rendered. There are even more grain control options when you upsize and downsize, but this is something you will do after some time using the Exposure X6 grain tool. Grain samples from the Nik presentation above look too even, more like a field of noise overlayed on the image.
Not very natural or particularly appealing to me, at least. I've used Silver Efex Pro right from the beginning. I sometimes feel as though I'd be in big trouble without it. Although some of the presets that come with it are fantastic, I've made all of my own that I now use for different applications. After a restart when you have open a picture in C1go to picture and go to "edit in Greets, reinipic.
Thanks, that's always what I thought, but how does one get C1 to recognize the NIK stuff as 'allowed applications? Tip: when the different applications are not seen in C1 plugins folder - start them manually once and you will see them in the plugins!
In C1, you might want to try creating an Export recipe and specifying 'Open with' as the application you want, like Silver Efex. Much quicker and slicker than right-click 'Open with' IMHO, because the Nik apps never appear in the list, you always have to go looking for them Tamed Munkey in C1 and Windows you need to get Windows to recognise the application as being an image editor. Navigate to the SilverEfex. The jpg opens in SilverEfex.
Close the program, open C1 and SilverEfex will be in C1's plugin list under preferences. Check the box if it is not already selected to make sure it appears in the edit with list. Important note for Silver Effects and Viveza in this release: If you applied either of these to smart objects in the previous version, the adjustment layers will NOT be recognized or modifiable in this version.
Nor will you be allowed to have both versions on the same machine; this version removes the previous version. That the previous version is removed is mentioned during the installation, but not the loss of backward compatibility. As a longtime fan of Silver EFEX, I downloaded the trial version of the new software last week, but hadn't gotten around to installing it it deletes your existing version, so save that if you need it. It certainly has more options, but this thing is ungodly slow in comparison to the free version.
I don't understand how the review can't notice this. Changes that were instantaneous yesterday now take several interminable seconds to render - which is a problem when you are considering a variety of changes. Maybe this software needs an update already.
Film is a little bit more than just adding digital grain in software. But then you are stuck with exactly ONE look.
Unless you scan, in which case you have inferior material as a starting point than even a 2MP digital camera from 10 years ago. Don't get me wrong, there is still a place for film and for "that look", but in my opinion it starts with Medium Format 6x6 or 6x9 or even better: Large Format view cameras.
I agree Last week I attend a portrait session with a 4x5 camera, and it was something special. Those platinum prints I'm sure it's pretty cool to grab a film slr and do it as it was done originally.
I got into photography in the digital age so didn't have that experience, but like the digital options these programs give. Of course, any modern digital camera will offer easier to achieve and better results than an old fully manual film camera, but they are fun to use. OK, if you also own a darkroom then that is a different story. You can also have fun by setting your digital camera to all manual. You either print those scans with an enlarger or you scan them, it is not that complicated.
How do you work with RAW in Sfex 3? Is there a way to use RAW? Adobe's products do that by saving the history of the changes made to a RAW file, and if I understand the process correctly, that requires attaching an additional layer of information. That's the way they have always worked. Personally, I like that so as not to modify the original RAW data. Open raw file as 16 bit smart object in photoshop, apply filter to smart object. Photoshop will then rerender the filter settings and you have the option of editing the smart filter to change its settings.
Really powerful and non destructive way to edit photos. I much prefer RNI Films 5. Not to mention the RNI colors are second to none. Not to mention spending hours in the lab with chemicals and then being able to send said files electronically. Grainy black and white adds grit to a gritty subject.
If you don't believe me, Robert Frank is a great example of a photographer who went against the grain by embracing grain as part of the look of his images. Also, I knew a guy who lived in Berlin in the 80s. He would go to gallery opening and various events, right afterwards, he would develop the film in his van and have prints ready in a matter of hours. Nice that now you just need a laptop and not a mobile darkroom.
Looks paid to me. No cons at all for software with destructive editing process and quite average not so accurate film looks. I own Nik Collection 3 with Silver Efex 2.
Even version 2 is as good as the reviewer states. Silver Efex is organised around working towards a black and white result with realistic black and white film feel not the grain but the subtlety in tone.
It's on another level than trying to create black and white in either PhotoLab or Photoshop or Capture One. It's a favorable review. It's no different that a "Silver Award" for a camera. A good review doesn't mean it's sponsored - it just means the reviewer liked the product. I then took advantage of a 'free - upgraded with all new bugs version' from Google some years later.
The first paid DxO version was essentially a bug fix of the last google version, which seemed bit harsh for people who had already paid and then had it broken, so I skipped that. Then when I tried an upgraded version from DxO trial , it proceeded to uninstall my existing version.
DxO did provide a link to the old Google 'free' version, but that kept crashing when trying to enter the key. I can no longer see a link to the old Google version from DxO, did they announced they stopped that. At this point, it's not really DxO's lookout to provide the free Google version. DxO acquired Nik in There's so many issues trying to run the free Google version on recent OS, it's really only valuable if you are running a computer with either Snow Leopard or Windows 7 and Photoshop CS6.
Both as stand-alone and as plugin to Photoshop Elements surprisingly. There is a Youtube Video somewhere how to download and install it, but I forgot the link. UncoyDP - Typically I'd agree with the general notion, but there are a number of unusual circumstances here, not least of which is DxO still branding it as Nik. It's still benefiting from the Nik heritage, so if not DxO to take care of that, then who?
They certainly knew what they were buying into. The main issue is with the trial uninstalling a working version, and that is still something within DxO's control, hence the question. I run them from Aperture. It's not my main computer, but the one I prefer photo editing on. Don't break what works :.
Aperture doesn't work anymore on that system, but there is an inexpensive software called Lyn Viewer, which was able to replace my Aperture. The switch was easier than I had thought. Exported the Aperture library to externally managed files, installed Lyn, and voila. It's all there. But at some point that hardware is going to fail, and with it your library, unless you transfer it. And if I wanted commercial, I go for Exposure, which actually does really good job in mimicking film "feel" in digital.
Cause there isnt highlighted fact that it has 30 days trial, right? You not very clever, are you. RawTherapee is free and as technically capable as any other RAW development application in the world. It's also a bear to use. If you can handle the frustration and learn to efficiently use the ultra-geeky interface of RawTherapee, kudos to you. You're a magnificent stoic and have a much stronger stomach than I do for ugly and overladen UX. I doubt Exposure does as good a job on black and white as Silver Efex, although it wouldn't surprise me if it matched PhotoLab, which also has film emulation including black and white.
Silver Efex was in another category for me when I worked on some black and white images head to head. Silver Efex is just easy, thats all. There are many solutions, a lot of them much less heavy handed, to get nice BW pics. RT is hard to learn, took me quite some time to get used to it, but there isnt anything out there that can match it in quite a few aspects.
Just its exact opposite of easy to use. Actually surprised me, last time I used it was x4. PhotoLab is really good in NR and they have rather okay demosaicing algo for most cameras as long as its Bayer matrix.
Also their color profiles for cameras are really good and make good base for any color or BW processing after. Being clever is not something I've ever been accused of. No app can beat real film. I think using some MF with it is probably better solution, or if someone is okay with large format, why not one of Fuji creations that could do some movements too.
I agree mit dem Fotografen. Rollfim on an LF view camera is quite viable. I did quite a bit of that on Arca 6x9 camera which also was convertible to 4x5. Transporting and handling sheets of film in holders and possibly changing them blindly in a dark tent in the field is quite a different level of endeavour and effort required. Rollfilm is fun, and it scans reasonably well on an Epson flatbed V or so unlike 35mm film. Well, I tried to carry an argument ad absurdum I regarded rather snobby in the first place.
But if you want to argue seriously, when working with LF 4x5 I typically shot landscape, and when doing that rollfilm was simply incapable of delivering even the sharpness that my original Sony a7R is capable of. In any case, the endeavor to make digital look like film is rather pointless in my book as in: that's my personal opinion not an absolute truth , simply because digital is technically superior to film so why take a step back? I get the 'creative look' part but is it really creative to make digital look like film, or to use lenses with tons of aberrations, for that matter?
Digital gives me the headroom to manipulate an image in a way that makes the most sense for that image. Its a shame that it has taken many months to get the bugs fixed and to get the software stable. But it is great software, with many powerful features. I just wish DxO would be a bit more interactive with their user base. Try feedback. The community has some talented and generous expert users.
The developers drop in occasionally could be more often, it's true. James Grove my Nik Collection had some pretty insane bugs. I would transfer about I contacted customer support in late November by opening a ticket. Some dude named Saito replied and in very bad English told me they'd deal with it. After some back and forth, riddled with typoes and including calling me Vittorino - quite uncouth, they simply disappeared and never fixed my issue.
I have emailed twice, in January and June and got no response. So much for spending so much money. I have been using PhotoLab, Filmpack and the other one for a couple of years and am pleased, but have been terribly disappointed by customer service. Is it worth the hefty price tag? We take a look at the Cine, the high-end model in this series. The Sony a7 IV is the fourth generation of the company's core a7 full-frame mirrorless camera model, and it's the most advanced yet. Click through for an in-depth look at Sony's latest full-frame mirrorless ILC.
The Nikon Z mm F2. Get all the details in our full review. What tripod can support a mm lens and still go on a long hike into the wilderness? We test out six higher-end, thick-legged, modular tripods that are comfortably tall and capable of supporting tremendous amounts of gear. This group review compares all six models, examining their features, functions and ergonomics in use, both in the studio and out in the field.
The Panasonic GH5M2 is a refresh, rather than complete reworking, of the company's image-stabilized, video focused GH5. We didn't find live streaming as reliable as we'd hoped but we appreciated the improved feature set.
0コメント